tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31155409.post6821719007277406732..comments2015-09-17T07:41:44.110+10:00Comments on Real UFOs - The latest UFO videos and News from all over the world ufo video photos ovnis ufos ovni: Strange objects near the Sun May 29th, 2010realufosnoreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31155409.post-66861506461642228312010-06-02T00:41:10.343+10:002010-06-02T00:41:10.343+10:00If this is nothing, then why do NASA remove the pi...If this is nothing, then why do NASA remove the pictures from their site? <br /><br />1. http://img571.imageshack.us/img571/2127/20100529024530n7eua195.jpg UFO image<br /><br />http://stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov/browse/2010/05/29/ahead/euvi/195/2048/20100529_024530_n4euA_195.jpg NASA Reupload<br /><br />2. http://img709.imageshack.us/img709/4007/20100529013530n7eua195.jpg UFO image<br /><br />http://stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov/browse/2010/05/29/ahead/euvi/195/2048/20100529_013530_n4euA_195.jpg NASA Reupload<br /><br />3. http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/2448/20100529041530n7eua195.jpg UFO image<br /><br />http://stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov/browse/2010/05/29/ahead/euvi/195/2048/20100529_041530_n4euA_195.jpg NASA Reupload<br /><br />There is also a couple of UFO images from May 30th on NASAs site, http://stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov/browse/2010/05/30/ahead/euvi/195/2048/20100530_045530_n7euA_195.jpg<br /><br />They'll probably be gone soon too :sMatshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09753106341619724444noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31155409.post-82703922358259925762010-06-01T06:19:22.591+10:002010-06-01T06:19:22.591+10:00I'am also interested to know about this strang...I'am also interested to know about this strange phenomenae. What I do not understand is this: Why does NASA not change the 15 minute period the satellite takes these pictures?<br /><br />When they would take more pictures with less time between them we would be able to get a better view and see what is really going on. We only see intervals and never full sequences.<br /><br />SanderAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31155409.post-74746395977828188712010-06-01T00:03:00.439+10:002010-06-01T00:03:00.439+10:00the official story is that these "objects&quo...the official story is that these "objects" are image processing artifacts. So...if they are, why have they only been appearing recently? On the flip side though, why do they appear then disappear? One would think that on at least two images (consecutive)one of the "objects" would only move a little or be in the same spot.hmm.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31155409.post-4320632141401181312010-05-31T19:27:52.940+10:002010-05-31T19:27:52.940+10:00Its matter ejected by the sun - we must be despera...Its matter ejected by the sun - we must be desperate in belief of UFO's to think these are 'alien' ships.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31155409.post-20054415352231453872010-05-31T18:29:35.070+10:002010-05-31T18:29:35.070+10:00Terrible video, virtually nothing is visible and a...Terrible video, virtually nothing is visible and absolutely nothing indicates the few "objects" are "mother ships" or UFOs. They could be Mercury, Venus, or photographic artifacts. Much ado about nothing. Posts like that one do nothing but ruin what little credibility exists within the UFO community. "Look at me, I posted this and have outdone NASA..." Yeah, right.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31155409.post-4358364621638366122010-05-31T04:01:39.879+10:002010-05-31T04:01:39.879+10:00The word verification words are not random letters...The word verification words are not random letters of the alphabet.Push Backnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31155409.post-76566469107734053682010-05-31T01:11:53.752+10:002010-05-31T01:11:53.752+10:00I don't see.. anything at all? And given the ...I don't see.. anything at all? And given the low res of the video and limited colour I would say this is extremely inconclusive. <br /><br />This website/blog is fantastic and I love checking it most days, but its a disappointment when I see things like this.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31155409.post-60361978162213193212010-05-31T00:58:24.231+10:002010-05-31T00:58:24.231+10:00Sooo close to the sun...No,I don't think so......Sooo close to the sun...No,I don't think so....!!?Too hot even for them...!!! OR...??LOL!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31155409.post-59773379930082405672010-05-30T11:01:51.758+10:002010-05-30T11:01:51.758+10:00OK, think about why they all chose 2012 in the beg...OK, think about why they all chose 2012 in the beginning. It was all just about a Mayan calendar. But for Mayans, nothing happens after 2012, it's just a new cycle that is beginning.<br /><br />Then they all went crazy because of the solar cycle which should reach its maximum at 2012 (what a nice coincidence!). Now, newer calculations of sunspots <a href="http://econotwist.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/sunspots-200903-large.jpg>predict the maximum solar activity around 2013/2014</a>.<br /><br />What is a fact is that the solar activity has a direct impact on psychic activity. Now that is fascinating.<br /><br />Have a look at the study of Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta about correlation of solar activity and stock markts here:<br /><br />http://www.frbatlanta.org/filelegacydocs/wp0305b.pdf<br /><br />Citation from the abstract:<br />"A large body of psychological research has shown that geomagnetic storms have a profound effect on people's moods, and, in turn, people's moods have been found to be related to human behavior, judgments and decisions about risk."<br /><br />One shouldn't spend too much time on listening to words like "This and that will happen" when there is no explanation, _why_ this and that should happen.<br /><br />-- zerwasAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31155409.post-31743728235315829822010-05-30T10:55:55.493+10:002010-05-30T10:55:55.493+10:00What you're seeing are not actual objects, but...What you're seeing are not actual objects, but artifacts of the extreme and very lossy onboard compression scheme used to cram even the reduced-format (512 x 512 rather than 2048 x 2048 native format) images into the 633 bps we get in near-realtime "space weather beacon mode" telemetry instead of the 240 Kbps we get on solid state recorder dumps through the Deep Space Network. The full resolution data via the DSN are compressed losslessly onboard and replace the beacon mode images when we get them 2 - 3 days later.<br /><br /> The artifacts are most likely to show up when there's a charged particle (cosmic ray or solar energetic particle) hitting the CCD detector in the SECCHI EVUI instrument (or one of the other SECCHI cameras).<br />If you're interested in the specific compression scheme that does the damage, it's a variant of the ICER compression used on the Mars Rovers, but cranked way up. Please see the attached paper, especially Figure 2, for examples of what happens when you set the compression dial too high on ICER.<br /><br /> We only use such high compression in order to follow developing solar activity within a time scale of the transmission time from the spacecraft (now approaching 10 minutes), plus data receipt and retransmission, and processing time on the ground (~ 5 minutes). Often not so pretty but adequate for early warning.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31155409.post-37033757343516589892010-05-30T10:19:25.729+10:002010-05-30T10:19:25.729+10:00It would seem that the shadows on these "obje...It would seem that the shadows on these "objects" do not conform to their position relative to the sun,<br />Even in a false color photo, they would still reflect light and cast a shadow.<br /><br />I don't think they represent physical objects (which would be the size of the earth if near the sun).william galisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02979337198868112133noreply@blogger.com