Nice new video by Jaime Maussan collection of UFO footage 2007

A bit off the ufo topic guys....
If your familiar with 'star wars' and the character Yoda you will be interested to find that his teachings and use of the 'force' were actually historically based on the real eastern pratice of 'Qigong'. The Jedi master (similar to the'qigong master') posseses powers such as telekinesis, fast movements and other seemily extra ordingary abilities. However in china to this day, such abilities are not unheard of and are often common in Qigong masters , such abilities range from being able to boil water at will, to moving objects and creating fire (don't belive me - see the below videos!). Infact the kungfu masters of the real Shoalin temple in China (as mentioned and seen in the movie 'Crouching tiger Hidden Dragon') developed qigong to assist them to achieve extraordinary moves and defensive capabiltites beyond physical capabilities.
The below videos demonstrate the force or (qi or chi ) in action with various masters with impressive abilities. If you would like to learn qigong yourself i recommend this one

Telekinesis and qigong:


Qigong and Kung Fu:


"An ally is the Force. And a powerful ally it is. Life creates it. . makes it grow. Its energy surrounds us and binds us luminous beings, though, not this crude matter. You must feel the Force around you. Between you, me, the tree, the rock, everywhere, yes, even between the land and the ship." -Yoda, Jedi Master of Star Wars-

Orange lights dancing in the night sky moved in formation, coming and going in waves.
Numerous reports were phoned and emailed into the Echo of strange events in the sky at around 10pm last night.Dorset police confirmed they had received 'a few' calls and suggested it could possibly be a meteor shower or chinese lanterns. They are discounting the possibility of a military cause because, they say, the services inform them if they are conducting exercises at night in the area.



Taxi firm boss Nicky Smith, 38, of Capstone Road said this morning: "It was an incredibly strange experience. I've never seen anything like it before.

"I was just turning my car around in the road when I saw a group of about 20 people from a nearby dance studio standing in the street looking up to the heavens. They seemed to be transfixed."I wondered what on earth they were looking at. There were about six of these bright orange lights to the right of the moon. It was an amazing sight and I was completely bemused."

Nicky, who videoed the lights, said the episode went on for about 40 minutes as the lights moved around, formed into a line and disappeared one by one, then appeared to return in two more waves.

She added: "I called my husband Mark out to take as look and although he's very sceptical about UFOs and stuff like that, even he admitted he couldn't explain what it was." Another emailer, Michelle wrote: "We saw five or six lights in the south-south-east, initially in a wide triangle and then in wide crescent formation - then they went into a straight line.

"The movement was barely discernible and they appeared to be heading upwards. This was at about 10.20pm and at around 10.25pm a huge orange/red light rose rose up from the south horizon. It seemed to stop, moved upwards very, very slowly untill it disappeared." Bournemouth resident Graham Warren confirmed he also saw six lights.
source

not sure baout this one, what do you think?

Have posted it before but this was requested by someone its from pilot ufo sightings .
This is the 1986 sighting of a UFO stalking a Japanese jetliner going to Alaska. Lots of critical data was collected in this sighting

i thought this was a ballon but the flashing lights reminds me of the probes i posted before what do you think?

Hi there for all of those who watched the great global warming swindle, and responded to my previous post on global warming and still follow the belief that it is caused by solar change please read this artcile (from Sydney newspaper) :

The problem with The Great Global Warming Swindle, which the ABC plans to screen and which caused a sensation when it was broadcast in Britain earlier this year, is that to make its case it relies not on visionaries, but on people whose findings have been proven wrong. The implications could not be graver. Thousands of people could be misled into believing there is no problem to address.

The film's main contention is that the rise in global temperatures is caused not by greenhouse gases but by changes in the sun's activity. It is built around the premise that in 1991 the Danish atmospheric physicist Dr Eigil Friis-Christensen discovered that recent temperature variations on Earth coincided with the length of the cycle of sunspots: the shorter they were, the higher the temperature. Unfortunately, he found nothing of the kind. A paper published in the journal Eos in 2004 reveals that the finding was the result of incorrect handling of data. The truth is the opposite: temperatures have continued to rise as the length of the sunspot cycle has increased.

So Friis-Christensen developed another means of demonstrating that the sun was responsible, claiming to have discovered a remarkable link between cosmic radiation influenced by the sun and global cloud cover. This is the mechanism the film proposes for global warming. But, again, the method was exposed as faulty. It relied on satellite data which did not measure global cloud cover.

So the hypothesis changed again. Without acknowledging that his previous paper was wrong, Friis-Christensen's co-author, Henrik Svensmark, declared there was a correlation not with total cloud cover but with low cloud cover. This, too, turned out to be incorrect. Then, last year, Svensmark published a paper purporting to show that cosmic rays could form tiny particles in the atmosphere. Accompanying it was a press release that went way beyond the findings reported in the paper to claim the study showed that past and present climate events are the result of cosmic rays.
This doesn't seem to have troubled the makers of the program, who report the cosmic ray theory as if it trounces all competing explanations.

The film also says man-made global warming is disproved by conflicting temperature data. Professor John Christy speaks about the discrepancy he found between temperatures at the Earth's surface and temperatures in the troposphere (or lower atmosphere). But the program fails to mention that in 2005 his data was proved wrong, by three papers in Science magazine.

Christy said last year he was mistaken. He was one of the lead authors of a paper that states the opposite of what he says in the film. Previously reported discrepancies between the amount of warming near the surface and higher in the atmosphere have been used to challenge the reality of human-induced global warming. Specifically, it was said surface data showed substantial warming, while early versions of satellite and radiosonde (weather-balloon) data showed little or no warming above the surface. This significant discrepancy no longer exists because errors in the satellite and radiosonde data have been identified and corrected.

Until recently, when found to be wrong, scientists went back to their labs to start again. Now, emboldened by the global denial industry, some, like the filmmakers, shriek censorship.

There is one scientist in the film whose work has not been debunked: the oceanographer Carl Wunsch. In the film he appears to support the idea that increasing carbon dioxide is not responsible for rising global temperatures. But Wunsch says he was misrepresented by the program, and misled by the people who made it.

You can sustain a belief in these propositions only by ignoring the overwhelming body of contradictory data. To form a balanced, scientific view, you have to consider all the evidence, on both sides of the question. The failure to understand the scientific process just makes the job of whipping up a storm that much easier. The less true a program is, the greater the controversy.
George Monbiot Source

Have posted before but this one has great zoom ins on the ufo:

Interesting zoom in on ufo

new video not sure what do you think?,
*warning* the guy swears alot:

Seems like ufos have a history of appearing in finland:

about ufo probes if you haven't seen before