Everyone has been asking me to post this video, I saw it 2 days ago when it came out and i wasn't sure if it was a camera effect or not. However upon closer looking at full screen you can see the red light objects and above the temple you see the object descending .. it is interesting. Also compare the footage to the original video filmed a few days ago... that thing that descends over the temple is the same object.
Now that multiple sources filing the same object have come out it makes you really thing hard about what this object was. RealUfos is calling out to all people and tourists in Jerusalem who spotted this light recently to respond to this post to let us know more about this sighting .
Descending on the temple (this object)
MSNBC Coverage
Rate this posting:
Now that multiple sources filing the same object have come out it makes you really thing hard about what this object was. RealUfos is calling out to all people and tourists in Jerusalem who spotted this light recently to respond to this post to let us know more about this sighting .
Descending on the temple (this object)
MSNBC Coverage
{[['
', '
']]}
', '']]}
{["Useless", "Boring", "Need more details", "Perfect"]}
Posts
24 comments:
must see doco
http://newparadigm.no/web/guest/the-day-before-disclosure
I'm sure it's a fake. Including the voices in the background. The Tourist in the background shouts "Look a UFO", but the absolutely normal reaction would be to tell of a light - there is no flying saucer but a lightball.
the close up video looks very fake, you can see the "handheld" script for after effects, apart from that, there is a lens blur on the object, like the camera is not focused on that distance, but the dome, which is in the same distance, is much less blurred, emphasizing the fact it's on a different layer, again, in after effects... about the 2 long shot videos, I'd say they are genuine, also from the fact I'm israeli and the background voices sound good, only thing that bothers me is the fact they say "wow" in an english accent ( israeli usually pronnaounce it "waw") meanning they might have intended for it to be more understandable for english speakers, but it might just be genuine, compression on the long shot videos looks good and I'd probably buy it if it wasn't for the obviously fake close up.
Another from a different angle:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYEOLwgGzPg&feature=
The 2 videos from outside of town are genuine and true, but the second video is proved to be static image of dome and surrounding with ball of light added later. You can see that tourist video is fake because no other light is blinking and nothing moves a bit (light or something else) in whole video, except UFO. I hate people that make fake videos, so you have to doubt the real ones. Also Stephen Bassett is announcing undeniable proof of alien existance on conference scheduled for 04.Febuary 2011.(hope its not 2 Jerusalem sync videos).
There's now a 4th vid of the light. Also fake. I'd recognize the effect 10/10 times, because I used the same effect in a college project. The 4th vid (when you see it) is a 3ds max lens flare, animated using the dopesheet (a chart in 3ds max that is used for motion and timing, as well as audio) and imposed into another video using Adobe AE. I don't know what the purpose of all these are, but I'm REALLY tired of explaining how these are hoaxed on YouTube.
please check umit0770 channel on youtube. Guy has a 300+ videos of stationary UFO in his town. I never saw so large collection ever...
And dont publish this comment. Thank you. I want you just to check it out.
In the close up video the lights in the background around the dome don`t glare, don`t go on and off, don`t move. Which is unusual. It`a frozen image, a picture. Yes, this video spoils the effect of the first one.
Check out the 4th video of this event. I tried to submit it to realufos, but the submission page does not work. http://www.allnewsweb.com/page1199999479.php
I dont think it's fake... I only say this because a week ago I was in the Bronx around kingsbridge looking down towards Manhattan on a subway platform and saw EXACTLY the same dancing red lights high in the sky, just like in these videos from Jerusalem.
Three videos are clearly a team work pretending they don't know each other.
There's motion blur (shutter speed won't be high speed in bad lighting). The lights from city show smooth streak except the light ball that sped up didn't match the camera's shutter speed setting.
Ya know I would think that if you were a tourist in the HOLY land and saw a bright light descending on the dome of the rock ones first reaction would be to say "Wow is that an Angel?" or something equally God oriented? don't know, that's just me.
so 3 diffrent people at diffrent place around the city were able to fake 3 diffent videos & edit them to all look the same within a 24 hour time period.
if this is fake them i will fund a team to try to replicate a video like this & edit them within a 24 hour timeframe.
On the 2 clips with similar view point a flash is clearly visible just under 2 secs before the orb rises, where is the flash of light on the original clip? I couldn't see it at all, but credit where credits due the angles and perspective on all clips do seem to match accurately and if it's fake it's a good one!
As you should know by now, there's a 4th video of this event, real or not. Four teenagers drive around in a car, stop and step out, and then get the same scene on camera from another vantage point. It looks like it might be a composite made after the original clip went viral. Let's see if there are any more coming up. If it really happened there should be plenty of witnesses who were in the vicinity of the shrine.
I'd like to see a comprehensive analysis of the four videos by Bruce Maccabee. Not that his work has always been entirely authoritative (thinking of his dubious approval of the Gulf Breeze material in particular), but he'll have a lot of observations about this case for sure.
In the close up video the flares produced by city lights don´t react to camera movement and are diferent from the flare of the object. The flares are produced by the lens so it should be the same for all light sources. And as the camera moves it should produce light blurs. So the image of the city is a still picture no doubt about it. That´s why the camera do not follow the object as it goes up. Totally fake.
The close up is a fake! you can see the Background is just a picture.
I also agree its a fake. there are debunk videos as well as the "actual" picture that was used to create the close up one "still image"
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=156038&page=2
"Three videos are clearly a team work pretending they don't know each other.
There's motion blur (shutter speed won't be high speed in bad lighting). The lights from city show smooth streak except the light ball that sped up didn't match the camera's shutter speed setting."
My sentiments exactly. Some1 moderately skilled at 3dsmax/AdobeAE with too much time on their hands and a collection of tourist footage from Jerusalem.
It isn't the first time that Stephen Bassett has claimed that he was going to provide some undeniable proof. I'll believe it when I see it.
Why do people have to not only fake these vids but then post them claiming they are the same as the actual footage, ufology is the worse for it!!....go away special effects wannabes to some star wars forum in a galaxy far far away. Just plain annoying and killing the credibility of this subject.
this site is a joke u people dont know shit!!
The Jerusalem UFO over the Dome is a hoax...It was clearly edited. I am sorry to say, that no matter how convincing it is at a glance, it is indeed a fake. I can't wait till' someone finally captures a real one...That day is coming soon...
Post a Comment