These huge spherical UFO's started appearing around January 18, 2010. They are on both the forward and rear images taken by NASA's Stereo Spacecraft in space. They appear to be moving as they are in different positions on many photos. Remember these are huge possibly at least the size of Earth. Further, if they were planets or some type of huge asteroid comets, they would already have been pulled into the sun by the strong gravity the sun produces as in the case of the recent comet.
Rate this posting:
{[["☆","★"]]}
Posts
11 comments:
... religionst science, http://genastropsychica.blogspot.com/ ...
I'm prone to believe these are artifacts of the digital image rather than "spheres". Let me explain why.
The reason that they appear to be spheres, rather than just sort of circle shaped, is that they have reflections of light on them which show a curved surface. That is a visual cue used by your brain to extrapolate depth of field, part of how we interpret three dimensions visually.
The problem is that those "reflections" are invariably on the opposite side of the sphere as the sun. The reflections are on the observers side, not the sun's side. As the sun would be the strongest source of light for something that close to the sun, it would lead you to believe that these are not spheres orbiting the sun.
This means that they are either not reflective spheres, are something with an internal light source bright enough to overcome the brightness of the sun itself (those lights would have to be BRIGHT if they were internal illumination and we SAW IT against the sun), or are much smaller objects which are much closer to the observer than proposed.
An awesome mystery, no matter how heated the debate is! :)
There is no heated debate. If the objects are in the suns corona , will the suns corona be streaming around , swirling around the objects ?
I would like to see older images. If this is a common occurrence, they will show up in archive images. If this is a new anomaly, there won't be any.
Virtually you might be wrong....I am a photographer and know of artifacts and such. Moreover.....ALL of these images have been removed from the site!
i have jus looked at them they are still on there an look through the other files there are lots of them yet another cover up of somethin out govs dont want us to know a bit of knowledge isnt dangerous!!
The pictures are still on the website. for example the ones from 18th jan 2010. at first i thought (512 Kb versions) i could not believe my eyes - but then i downloaded the 1024 Kb version and in those one can clearly see they are nothing else than digital splinters
i wished they would have been real, but in my oppinion they are not - sorry...
The pictures are still on the website. for example the ones from 18th jan 2010. at first i thought (512 Kb versions) i could not believe my eyes - but then i downloaded the 1024 Kb version and in those one can clearly see they are nothing else than digital splinters
i wished they would have been real, but in my oppinion they are not - sorry...
I went into this subject with a crtical mind, hoping to disprove or explain these anomolies
Interestingly I recently found that NASA has even got a webpage up explaining these "anomolies" are compression artifacts and "Cosmic ray interference" on the images .....However if these are simple "artifacts and cosmic ray disturbances" as NASA has stated.... Why on earth would they have removed all the pictures from their website?
Such behaviour is known as acting on guilt, and is evidence that NASA is attempting to cover up something. Had they not "hidden" this material, it would not have been as suspicious as it is currently.
Of course NASA went into this big long super technical and then also
unverifiable
explanation of "Glitches".
Does NASA condone glitches of any kind ever while doing anything?
No they don't, so why do they release these images and not
say as a disclaimer..."And by the way people there are glitches in the photographs so don't be alarmed"
Post a Comment