Is it just a co-incidence that so many huge earthquakes are happening so close together worldwide or not? - please comment
The quakes, measuring 6.9 magnitude at their peak, began just after 8am, when children in the sparsely populated region were preparing to go to school, and were followed by a series of six aftershocks that destroyed 85 per cent of houses in the town nearest the epicentre. Rate this posting:
{[["☆","★"]]}
Posts
15 comments:
i hear that we will have disclosure this year (i hope so) but the intersting thing is that where i got my info from they also mention these earthquakes, now in the video i saw it stated there will be about 13-15 earth quakes this year before disclosure we are now in april and had 5 of the bastards so far..... go figure
Don't forget that Solomon Island was hit by a 6.8 quake on April 11, 2010 at 9:40:31 UTC, and about 13 hours after, another 6.2 magnitude earthquake has struck Spain 15 miles southeast of Grenada on that same day. Look at http://twitter.com/earthquake for a list of quakes greater than 5.0 in the last days (Very impressive!!).
The worse the world gets the better I like it. The last days of this age are my desire. It's time to dance.
Nothing to do with UFO's.
Its Planet X !!!!!!
could it be planet x/nibiru bearing down on the solar system given at least three other planets like mars,saturn and pluto have also warmed up and saturn is experiencing climatic changes that if the same changes have occurred on earth we would be dead; indicates the sun and solar system is heating maybe a large object near the solar system interacting with our own sun thus interacting with earth causing it to heat up and geographically unstable causing earthquakes and global warming + the heat from this object(nibiru)also heating up the solar system.there is also a mountain of historical info on this planet or brown dwarf dating back 6000 yrs
PLANET X/NIBIRU COMING!!!
Great Article, but I have to laugh. This question should be seen on CNN and the new york times, etc. But you only see it on the UFO sight. That makes me think more than it makes me laugh though...
Many institutions limit access to their online information. Making this information available will be an asset to all.
what the hell is going on?... why earthquacks? hitting the poor people!!. this isn't right. i don't know guys but i think they're making HUGE human sacrifice going on. all i wonder is "who's next".
Black Cat.
continued if still reading....
Jupiter deserves some crunching too: three vortices merged into one to form the so-called Red spot Jr. How unusual is this? By the way, the idea of Jovian internal heat is not new, see this:
But Galileo certainly helped restart the debate, as discussed here:
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/1996/96-103.txt
I noted the following passage:
" According to mission scientists, Galileo probe data
strongly suggest that circulation patterns in Jupiter's cloud tops and its interior (which runs 10,000 miles deep) are part of one continuous process. Dr. David Atkinson of the University of Idaho continues to report persistent Jovian wind velocities of over 400 mph. The probe detected no reduction in wind speed, even at its deepest levels of measurement,approximately 100 miles below Jupiter's clouds. Galileo scientists regard this finding as confirmation that the main driving force of Jupiter's winds is internal heat radiating upward from the planet's deep interior. The strength of the Jovian winds and the fact that they do not subside with depth is very significant, according to Dr. Andrew Ingersoll of the California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA." This blurb is interesting also: http://www.jhu.edu/~gazette/julsep96/sep0996/model.html
Closer to Earth: for all the talk about Mars, it is worth pointing that it went trough significant cooling after the Viking landing, before experiencing the more recent warming some are so excited about (which is best explained by dust storm patterns). It does not leave that much correlation with Earth changes.
The bottom line is this: what is presented as climate change carries little meaning when the climates in question are so poorly known to start with. Outer SS planets are exposed to all sorts of influences that have as much weight as the solar constant in their "climate." Attempts to show a solar source to terrestrial climate change by pointing to observations on other planets whose significance is unclear should be received with the highest skepticism. Especially when there are satellite observations of solar irradiance available for Earth.
To @anonymous
Read the excerpt from Philippe Chantreau about climate change skeptics and may enlighten you somewhat I hope !
What "local" climate statistics do you use to justify the assertion that Saturn or any other outer SS planet is undergoing climate change? The IPCC definition of climate for Earth involves a 30 years period. I'm sure you know what kind of time period that translates into for Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune or Pluto (respectively 356, 884, 2522, 4947 and 7435 years, give or take).
I find interesting that "skeptics" so eagerly recommend taking the enormous amount of highly accurate data available for Earth with a grain of salt (or the all shaker for that matter), while at the same time accepting wild conclusions on poorly understood extra-terrestrial "climates" based on very scant, spotty observations. If you want to tell me about climate change on outer SS planets, I'll take the skeptical approach and ask for some serious climate history and data before considering any conclusion.
As for Pluto's expanding atmosphere observation, it was made under ideal conditions, with equipment never available before (KECK, if I remember right). So, even if the event witnessed on that occasion is a regular occurrence, it could never have been seen before, for that reason and this other detail: with a year lasting close to 248 Earth years, Pluto has not been observed through a full orbit yet. Should we add that Pluto's atmospheric changes are suspected to be highly albedo dependent and that Pluto has been darkening since the 50's (collection of space materials is probable)? There are countless caveats and like considerations for all the planets supposedly experiencing "climate change."
How about crunching some numbers and showing us what kind of energy output would be necessary from the Sun to obtain those changes that you assert are Sun driven? Then we could compare that with the observed changes in solar irradiance. You could crunch some more and come up with theoretical values of increased energy input for Venus and compare with what is actually happening there (not much unusual if I recall), where the Sun is mighty close.
Welcome to Real Ufo videos and Farmers almanac. what, no weather report?
So now your fox news view is contradicted and all that you could do is paint it as farmer's almanac ? No wonder you foxy muppets have negative IQs !!
Hey, praths4barca, I was referring to the fact that this is SUPPOSED to be a UFO web site. As far my Fox news viewing goes, you have no idea what you're talking about, but as usual for chickenshit internet commenters,you just spew more hate at someone you have never met. I very, very seldom watch TV of any sort, so suck on that!
Post a Comment