A search for these signals is ongoing by several groups including volunteer members of the SETI League. Time labels the vertical axis of the above plot, and frequency marks the horizontal axis. Although this strong signal was never positively identified, astronomers have identified in it many attributes characteristic of a more mundane and ultimately terrestrial origin. In this case, a leading possibility is that the signal originates from an unusual modulation between a GPS satellite and an unidentified Earth-based source. Many unusual signals from space remain unidentified. No signal has yet been strong enough or run long enough to be unambiguously identified as originating from an extraterrestrial intelligence.
{[["☆","★"]]}
Posts
8 comments:
Oddly, there is no mention of this whatsoever on the NASA website.
Draw your own conclusions.
I'm sorry but videos like this one is just not credible.
That is not true. This story or respectively the picture can be found as an astronomy picture of the day on the NASA website, February 6 2011, submitted by the SETI League ( http://www.setileague.org/ ). Here is the link: http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap110206.html
However, i admit that such videos don't own much credibility. But once in a while you should make an effort and really check if such a story is on the NASA website or not, and not just claim that it isn't, just because you haven't seen it on the frontpage. Wasn't so hard at all to find it btw.
yeah, sourceless, dodgy as!
I think we are using the rong Technology, in my opinion!...Why?
If you except,that ETs.are in great numbers, around this Earth &
in space, from where ever they come from,and you are seeing them them all the time; then they must be in communication with one another!....So, why have we not heard them?....WHY?
I can only think of four reasons!
1. They don't wont us to!
2. They just don't exist! or
3. They do exist,and we aren't on their wave length of Technology!
OR perhaps a fourth reason is:
We are not being told the truth!.....?
I posted the comment above about NOT finding this on the NASA page...clearly, it IS there and I was simply unable to track it down previously. Apologies.
Did you mean?
ac·cept /ækˈsÉ›pt/ Show Spelled
[ak-sept] Show IPA
–verb (used with object)
1. to take or receive (something offered); receive with approval or favor: to accept a present; to accept a proposal.
2. to agree or consent to; accede to: to accept a treaty; to accept an apology.
3. to respond or answer affirmatively to: to accept an invitation.
4. to undertake the responsibility, duties, honors, etc., of: to accept the office of president.
5. to receive or admit formally, as to a college or club.
6. to accommodate or reconcile oneself to: to accept the situation.
7. to regard as true or sound; believe: to accept a claim; to accept Catholicism.
8. to regard as normal, suitable, or usual.
9. to receive as to meaning; understand.
10. Commerce . to acknowledge, by Signature, as calling for payment, and thus to agree to pay, as a draft.
11. (in a deliberative body) to receive as an adequate performance of the duty with which an officer or a committee has been charged; receive for further action: The report of the committee was accepted.
12. to receive or contain (something attached, inserted, etc.): This socket won't accept a three-pronged plug.
13. to receive (a transplanted organ or tissue) without adverse reaction. Compare reject ( def. 7 ) .
http://dictionary.reference.com/
" then they must be in communication with one another!....So, why have we not heard them? "
HUH why must they communicate with one another ? I don't believe its a must.
Post a Comment