Rate this posting:
{[["☆","★"]]}
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
Lights over Santiago de Chile Jan 2011
Yet again could these recent lights over Santiago de Chile be simply lanterns or something else?
Rate this posting:
Rate this posting:
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Popular posts this month:
- Ben Rich Lockheed Skunk Works CEO Deathbed Ufo Confession
- Bill Birnes - why Ufo Hunters was pulled from the TV ?
- UFO Sighting: Toronto, Canada. 26/07/2014
- UFO Ovni Above Nuclear Facility- Mexico:05-11-2014
- What Could It Be? UFO Above Tysoe, Warwickshire UK: 29-12-14
- UFOs Sighted - Melbourne, Australia 09-02-13
- Happy New Year 2015 from RealUFO'S!
- A Closer Look: The 'Cauldrons' in the Valley of Death, Siberia
Posts
11 comments:
that is what is known as hovering,......
I have one question that's always nagged me. Why does an alien spacecraft need lights?
Maybe they're not lights but propulsion vents or visual sensors of some kind.
LOL!...Could it be an "Earth made craft" with lights?...we need lights!.........?
Probably the same reason any vehicle used for travel needs lights, so that other vehicles don't smash into it and destroy it in the dark. Any way, this is a creepy 1. I Don't think it's lanterns because this thing is hovering and hardly moving at all, plus strobing lights are faintly visible in the second video. I have no idea. And i swear to god if some anonymous idiot says "it's a plane" you should have your head examined and stop giving your opinion on UFO videos because you're useless.
and why is the 1. Video not avaible in my Country? LOL.........
Nothing new, to much zoom like always, and when you got a good shot, the watcher only film 20 seconds of it. oh COME ON!!!!!!! lol
How about record until the object departs or disappears or whatever... Why cut out in middle...
im from Tasmania and we get nothing like this kind of stuff round this side of the globe. it all seems to be happening in south america at the mo amigos. the space commancheros are everywhere. locals are tuning in. el gringos are tuning in. i reckon the first proper landing will be there somewhere. they obviously love it there for some reason or another, and always have.
I agree that people should film until the object disappears, but the guy in the first video filmed for a good 9 minutes, and the second 1 got a GREAT shot of it. Stop complaining people, you got to see it and that's what is important. You ever stop to think that maybe they couldn't film the entire time due to camera battery life, or maybe they had to be at work or they had somewhere they had to be? I swear, I read the comments on this site and it's like you all would complain about anything not filmed on an hd camera by some1 with hands steady as a brain surgeon.
yeah if i saw a ufo and was videoing it i would probably want to ditch the camera after a while so i could relish the moment, instead of missing trying to capture thw whole thing.
Yeah,
ok video, but why the "inter-zorgulonic dimensional krelk" language? What "gates" lie between anything? What are you talking about?
Just post your fucking videos without the music and poorly thought out subtitle-theories. Leave interpretation to the masses; all science is based on skepticism and if something is "real," then it will become known as real by the objective manner in which its presence was made known.
Not by the music and hokey-pokey "dimensional realities" ideas that come along with it.
Post a Comment