below extract from this article
The former manager of the Data and Photo Control Department at NASA’s Lunar Receiving Laboratory during the manned Apollo Lunar Program, Ken Johnston, has released quite a number of sensational statements recently in the USA. The specialist said that U.S. astronauts found ancient ruins of artificial origin and a previously unknown technology to control gravitation when then landed on the Moon. Astronauts took pictures of the objects that they found, but NASA ordered Johnston to destroy the images. Johnston did not follow the order. He said that the U.S. government had been keeping this information a secret for 40 years.
Johnston's startling Apollo allegations have recently appeared in a new book, "Dark Mission: the Secret History of NASA," co-authored by former NASA consultant and CBS Science Advisor, Richard C. Hoagland and Mike Bara, an aerospace engineering consultant. According to Kay Ferrari, JPL Director of the SSA Program (in a phone call to Johnston last week), it was Johnston "being quoted [as] criticizing NASA in Hoagland's new book, 'Dark Mission,'" that prompted her to ask for Johnston's resignation from the SSA Program. When Johnston refused, citing First Amendment protections of free speech afforded all NASA employees, even those at JPL, Ferrari apparently decided to remove him arbitrarily from the SSA Program this week without cause.
The low quality pictures included in the book depict ruins of buildings, huge dome-like objects made of glass, stone towers and castled hanging in the air.
“I have nothing to lose. I have quarreled with NASA and I got fired,” Ken Johnston said.
Indeed, NASA believes that allegations of the ancient civilization found on the Moon are not serious. The authors of the controversial book also say that President John F. Kennedy, who launched the lunar race with the Soviet Union, actually intended to share extraterrestrial technologies with Moscow. Making a speech at the United Nations Organizations in September of 1963, Kennedy supposedly offered the USSR to organize a joint mission to the Moon.
Richard Hoagland believes that Washington’s interest in the Moon exploration that suddenly appeared after 30 years of silence is based on the lunar findings that the U.S. government has been keeping a secret for 40 years. Russia, China, Japan and even India have publicly announced their plans to work on the exploration of the Moon. The USA, Hoagland said, wants to be the first at this point.
In December NASA announced plans to build an international base on one of the poles of the Moon. The base is to be finished by 2024. Russia’s booster rocket maker, Energia, has a more ambitious program: to build a permanent manned base on the Moon by 2015.
Russia says the base will be built to develop the industrial production of helium-3. U.S. specialists prefer not to say anything specific on the matter. To crown it all, China launched its first satellite to the Moon on October 24. China also intends to launch a lunar base and an unmanned space probe to the Moon by 2010.
Non-radioactive isotope of helium, helium-3, is a powerful fuel for the nuclear synthesis. Only six tons of this fuel would provide enough energy to power a large European country for one year. The qualities of the gas (pollution-free and very high output) make many countries treat the perspective as seriously as possible. Germany, India and China conduct a number of research works to develop methods of helium-3 extraction.
Hoagland and Johnston also intend to prove that NASA virtually acts as another defense department of the United States, entitled to classify important technical and scientific information without the control of the U.S. Congress.
article source - read more here
NASA Airbrushed bases on the Moon:
Posts
10 comments:
Hoagland is a joke! Just do a quick check on his credentials---he has none! Yes he did work for CBS back in the Cronkite days, but so what? Take a look at his website and you'll see many, many pictures of nothing...yet he sees lots of things in those blurry, grainy photographs. I'm not saying that NASA ever tells the truth, but I wouldn't believe anything associated with Richard C Hoagland!
interview with Johnston, very interesting
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-y1tUcM1xo&feature=PlayList&p=6DC68102FD4A0953&index=0
sounds more like a advertisement for a book :). former NASA employee, secret pictures.
if i was fired from NASA maybe i would made similar story just to intrigue and attract readers :) more serious proves should be provided, not just what i saw or heard somewhere :)
about moon base and helium-3 - interesting. maybe it will solve that crisis around :) new energy source :)
What ever happened too that satelite from japan that was suppose to fly around the moon and take pictures back in late 2007 i think it was??
Sorry anonymous I have read Dark Mission, and if you cannot see or understand what Mr Hoagland is trying to say, then you have no chance of ever getting to the truth. I dont say that you should believe Richard Hoagland but just try to undertstand what he is trying to tell us.Anyway going by your letter I get the feeling your dislike of Mr Hoagland is personal. Perhaps you do not like the clothes he wears or maybe the way he talks, by the way have you bothered to read Dark Mission.
Your Sincerely Truth Seeker
Sorry anonymous I have read Dark Mission, and if you cannot see or understand what Mr Hoagland is trying to say, then you have no chance of ever getting to the truth. I dont say that you should believe Richard Hoagland but just try to undertstand what he is trying to tell us.Anyway going by your letter I get the feeling your dislike of Mr Hoagland is personal. Perhaps you do not like the clothes he wears or maybe the way he talks, by the way have you bothered to read Dark Mission.
Your Sincerely Truth Seeker
Indeed, Hoagland is nucking futs!
Yeah, Hoagland is a blustering blowhard and has never gained any credibility whatsoever among serious researchers. He was the one who tried to present obvious compression artifacts in old low-resolution images as really being "immense glass structures" and other such arrant nonsense.
As much as I love all these ideas my issue with this book is the cover. If you look at the astronauts face shield there is clearly a reflection of an American flag... not the flag on the pole... so, who's really playing with photoshop?
This is all my arse!
Matt please show my movie on Helium3
We have been the moon and we will go back, why.. moneys
Please Matt. fp it, this is 2012! they are all racing for the moon for money
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2xChmfLlMo
Bevy
Post a Comment